Skip to content

Slicing and Dicing the Senate

Below are two syncronized animated charts. The file containing them is large, a half a Meg (sorry about that).

Each point on the charts represents one US Senator; they don’t move. The idea of this technique, “Optimal Classification Estimates”, is to reduce each legislator to two numbers and them pin them onto that graph. It’s extremely reductionist, but it works. The lines slicing thru the chart illustrate how voting proceeds on various bills. A line running from top to bottom reveals that a bill was decided largely on economic issues; while a line running left to right is a bill that was decided on social issues. The democrats on the left are economically liberal, i.e. they tend to look out for the weaker and more numerous economic actors. The Republicans on the right are economically conservative; look after the economically large, but few.

The chart on the right shows how well the model works. The hand full of points shown are Senators who votes didn’t fit the model.

I grab’d that chart from here.

The model is extremely accurate; around 95% these days. Amazingly you don’t actually need two axis; you will get 90% accuracy with a single axis that runs almost top to bottom, but slices slightly at an angle. You can see the entire Senate sorted into that ordering here. For example Joe Liberman isn’t the most conservative democratic Senator, there are a handful who are more to the right than he is.

I’ve writen about this model before; and I keep coming back to it because it totally changed the way I think about politics. It’s all economic; all the noise about social issues never actually flows thru into the legislative agenda.

If you download the chart and stick it into the right program (Quicktime player works for me) you can single step thru the votes. You can then go look up particular votes. That facinating because the topic of a bill may appear to be along one dimension but the vote shows clearly that it was entirely decided by another dimension. For example, the votes around now failed plan to create a guest worker program are a good example of social and economic conservative issues playing off against each other.

2 Comments

  1. David wrote:

    I hope you don’t mind that I digged your article.
    http://digg.com/politics/Chart_How_the_Senate_Votes_on_Part_Economic_Lines
    I thought it was really good.
    Keep it up.

    Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 5:01 pm | Permalink
  2. acm wrote:

    I guess I don’t fully understand what measure is being graphed along the horizontal axis — i.e., how do “liberal” and “conservative” translate into economics?

    Friday, September 1, 2006 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Stuff » The Robotic Senate on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 at 12:20 pm

    [...] Senate
    August 9, 2006 at 8:08 am | In Political Economy |

    Via Ben Hyde: Slicing and Dicing the Senate. Reduce each senator to two parameters, and you can draw a line d [...]

  2. O'DonnellWeb on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    Social Issues Are All Noise

    I’m not sure I completely understand this, but the writer claims that his charts prove that the Senate votes almost…

  3. [...] to see a blog post that actually looks at politics from the perspective of the common space scores.   The chart below shows the distribution of the scores for various state legislatures (i’ve [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*