Category Archives: General

How fungible is attention?

Drawing a crowd and then advertising to them is now common web business architecture. Pay for your business with other people’s eyeballs. Here is a variation on the idea I’d not seen before though. This hosting company asks that you pay for their hosting services by spending time in their online forums. Pay for your business with your own eyeballs. Interesting.

While this reminds me of those free vacations paid for by spending two hours locked in a room with a timeshare salesman; it’s actually more like the online communities where members accumulate karma points to achieve status. In this game you win hosting services. They even show the current score of the player’s in their forum postings.

Systems like this are a fascinating edge case in the space of accounting or currency system design. The points are slightly analogous to loyalty points like those used in the travel industries pricing games. Of course these points aren’t even as fungible as those. outragous seeming patent case suggests that somebody has probably already patented the idea of creating attention points and their related markets, accounting, etc.

Professional Grade Humor

A friend of mine floated a cool idea regarding humor. We all know that humor comes in various species: irony, farce, slapstick, etc. etc. But we lack a scale of how skilled a bit of humor is. There is a world of difference between the appropriate bit of humor inserted into a cocktail party and the art of finding the humorous thing to say in the midst of a funeral.

Humor, like enthusiasm, is not self-moderating. A classroom of high school students can trivially be drawn into an escalating chain reaction. It’s ironic; teachers who labor to nurture wit find it necessary to quench even the slightest fission of humor because their charges are such ill-trained humorists.

Of course all emotions run the risk of running off into exaggerated forms. Stress, panic, depression, etc. etc. The wonder of humor is its ability to call them back down out of the stratosphere. It’s a high art of getting it just right. A skill we have all observed in talented people around us. Injecting just the right bit of wit into a situation, diffusing at least a portion of the escalating emotions.

If this talent had a name you could put on a job description! Awards could be granted: “Best pun used in an IRS audit.” High school councilors could advise students join the guild. An international society could be formed. States could grant and revoke licenses. Weighty text books and complimentary multi-media virtual world educational games could be sold at great cost to state school boards.

XXVIII. Cruel and unusual punishments shall not be inflicted.

David Chess reports that he has been listening to Supreme Court Justice Scalia. David suggests that rather than the “originalist” label that Scalia likes it is more accurate to call him a “temporal denotationalist.” Which is to say that the constitution denotes exactly what it denoted at the instant it was signed. He quotes this bit by Scalia:

I’m saying the Eighth Amendment means what was cruel and unusual and unconstitutional in 1791 remains that today. The death penalty wasn’t, and hence it isn’t, despite the fact that I sat with three colleagues that thought it had become unconstitutional. Executing someone under eighteen was not unconstitutional in 1791, so it is not unconstitutional today. Now, it may be very stupid. It may be a very bad idea, just as notching ears, which was a punishment in 1791, is a very bad idea.

Temporal denotation strikes me as being very stupid and a bad idea.

David then suggests we should pass the 28th amendment:

XXVIII. Cruel and unusual punishments shall not be inflicted.

While to the untrained eye this would be a no-op it’s revolutionary to the eye of the “temporal denotationlist” since it resets the clock!

This could make for great political theater force the various state legislatures to vote to reratify the constitution! Welcome them into the 21 century. Look at the benefits: the industrial revolution, modern medicine, the electron, the novel, science, … golly!

Owning the Interuption Tax

Differing kinds of work demand differing heartbeats. Some work thrives on high interupt rates while other work demands long intense periods of concentration. If your work demands a low rate of interuptions than each interupt will be costly. Ross Mayfield has written a series of posts looking at these costs and their allocation from various points of view. For example in his latest post he mentions that in some situations the interuption tax can be as much as 15 minutes.

I want to draw attention to how this problem has many features that hint of money to be made. You have two sides, i.e. the person who want’s to interupt and the person who to be interupted, which means there is an oportunity for a middleman. There is a lot of value in play; i.e. 15 minutes. There is a high transaction rate. The problem is unsolved. Technology has tools to offer that help, but it is also displacing the old social contracted rules. Moore’s law is in play. A problem with that structure should attract the attention of people looking for high value hubs.

This problem is related to a mess of other stuff: the efficency of exclusion, the mystery where the sweet spot is in latency/bandwidth space for collaborative work, the conventional wisdom about where how high productivity in some kinds of work requires a asynchronious work environment.

Space: the API

My car’s check engine light came on. Being both modern and a cheapskate I found the online community where Passat owners hang out. My old car there had a secret pattern of key turns and button pushes that would cause the car reveal engine’s fault. I was hoping for something similar.

But car makers love to keep things secret. German car maker are more secretive than Japanese makers. So it is verboten for Passat owners to know what lies behind their check engine lights. My fellow owners showed me a way. Autozone will read out your check engine codes for free. Autozone has solidarity with those who to fix their own cars.

The man at Autozone climbed under my steering wheel and plugged in. He and I copied the codes down onto a peice of paper. He then placed his finger just under a large yellow button on the read out device. He held it up, away from his body, toward me. He turned and gazing away into the distance. My eyes followed, a large warehouse sat on the far side of the parking lot. He said speaking into the empty car. “If it’s still under warrenty we can’t press the big yellow button. That clears the codes.” He paused, gazing more closely at the warehouse. “I” “Can’t push the yellow button.”

The inside of Autozone is full of gadgets to hack your car. An entire asle of things that plug into the cigarette lighter. A wall of steering wheel covers. Two racks of things to hang from the rear view mirror. Devices that clip to the air vents on the dash board.

I once built a store front. A place where developers could sell their wares. The developer products all plugged into an existing product. Our product. We called it the developer’s market place, it was a way for the developers to reach our customers, our product’s users.

As mentioned car makers like to horde their options. They like to sell you the radio rather than relinquish that option to some random 3rd party. So generally auto makers are not very big on open APIs. I suspect they grumble about that cigarette lighter.

But standing looking at the Hawain shirt steering wheel covers at Autozone I had an epiphany. How little it takes to create an API. How small an affordance. The convex shape of the steering wheel, the latent hook on the rear view mirror, the trickle of electricity in the cigarette lighter.

A few days later I was listening to a talk by one of the dudes who have been hacking on the Prius. He throws up a slide showing the floor under the hatchback. There’s a panel. The panel is removed in his next slide and there is a small shallow space. Just a few inches deep. Useless really.

But, immediately I knew. That empty space! Full of latent energy. Waiting for their hack. Drawing them in. “Fill me!”

What happened? Why did Toyota leave that space? Did they actually know what they were doing. Did they know that empty space is an open API for developers? It’s not as hard to create open APIs as you might think.

A Culture of First Drafts

Nope, this is not a posting about blogging. This is a posting about IPR and DRM.

At lunch today a friend was related stories about various really horrible 50s science fiction he had read as a child. In one of these stories the high IQ crowd buds off from the rest of the population and then convinces them all to board a ship for Venus. This plot device, of course, reappears in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

Which illustrates that strong digital rights management is really a plan to assure we live in a culture of first drafts.