<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the briar patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/04/the-briar-patch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/04/the-briar-patch</link>
	<description>Ben Hyde</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notional Slurry &#187; links for 2009-04-13</title>
		<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/04/the-briar-patch/comment-page-1#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Notional Slurry &#187; links for 2009-04-13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/?p=2046#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>[...] Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm › the briar patch &quot;Dan manages to imply that the problem he encountered can be tagged open-source. Coordinating consistent builds across a tangle of libraries would seem to be hard enough that it would require some orchestration. It’s actually kind of striking how well this works in the loosely inter-project world of open source. Stefano has been known to point out that the friction that rises out of solving this problem creates inter-project social energy that’s extremely valuable. Which I’ll admit to wondering if it’s not a good thing that these problems arise.&quot; (tags: open-source cultural-norms standards software-development libraries community the-public-and-its-problems) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm › the briar patch &quot;Dan manages to imply that the problem he encountered can be tagged open-source. Coordinating consistent builds across a tangle of libraries would seem to be hard enough that it would require some orchestration. It’s actually kind of striking how well this works in the loosely inter-project world of open source. Stefano has been known to point out that the friction that rises out of solving this problem creates inter-project social energy that’s extremely valuable. Which I’ll admit to wondering if it’s not a good thing that these problems arise.&quot; (tags: open-source cultural-norms standards software-development libraries community the-public-and-its-problems) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luís</title>
		<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/04/the-briar-patch/comment-page-1#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Luís</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/?p=2046#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Heh, I regret having picked the name &quot;Babel&quot;. It&#039;s too good a name for what the library does.

Neat graph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I regret having picked the name &#8220;Babel&#8221;. It&#8217;s too good a name for what the library does.</p>
<p>Neat graph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
