<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Example of Boundry Formation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation</link>
	<description>Ben Hyde</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm &#8250; Community Stress Metrics</title>
		<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/comment-page-1#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm &#8250; Community Stress Metrics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>[...] seeking to increase the level of discontent, i.e. violence entrepreneurs, can talk up all these to create an impression of pending failure.  For example talk up fear of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seeking to increase the level of discontent, i.e. violence entrepreneurs, can talk up all these to create an impression of pending failure.  For example talk up fear of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hyde: The Offensive of Tagging &#124; Server software</title>
		<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/comment-page-1#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hyde: The Offensive of Tagging &#124; Server software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>[...] One extreme case makes the problem acute, i.e. when the polarization is being engineered on the boundary. When two groups are in dispute, when the rights of the group members are in play, when states are at war, etc. These cases are not rare, both because you can get two groups into opposition at any scale (marketing v.s. sales, offense v.s. defensive squad, freshman v.s. sophmores, etc. etc.) but also because there are numerous benefits that agents in these games can harvest from playing with these boundaries (hightened common cause, humor, separation of concerns, etc.). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One extreme case makes the problem acute, i.e. when the polarization is being engineered on the boundary. When two groups are in dispute, when the rights of the group members are in play, when states are at war, etc. These cases are not rare, both because you can get two groups into opposition at any scale (marketing v.s. sales, offense v.s. defensive squad, freshman v.s. sophmores, etc. etc.) but also because there are numerous benefits that agents in these games can harvest from playing with these boundaries (hightened common cause, humor, separation of concerns, etc.). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Offensive of Tagging</title>
		<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/comment-page-1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Offensive of Tagging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2005/02/an-example-of-boundry-formation/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>[...] One extreme case makes the problem acute, i.e. when the polarization is being engineered on the boundary. When two groups are in dispute, when the rights of the group members are in play, when states are at war, etc. These cases are not rare, both because you can get two groups into opposition at any scale (marketing v.s. sales, offense v.s. defensive squad, freshman v.s. sophmores, etc. etc.) but also because there are numerous benefits that agents in these games can harvest from playing with these boundaries (hightened common cause, humor, separation of concerns, etc.). So I&#8217;m amazed that Google has decided that one, just one, such case deserves a bit of special handling. This is the fundamental problem of a system like Google&#8217;s. All words are tags, all search terms have contextual meanings. I like that they have tried to do something. I hope they find a way to make it scale. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One extreme case makes the problem acute, i.e. when the polarization is being engineered on the boundary. When two groups are in dispute, when the rights of the group members are in play, when states are at war, etc. These cases are not rare, both because you can get two groups into opposition at any scale (marketing v.s. sales, offense v.s. defensive squad, freshman v.s. sophmores, etc. etc.) but also because there are numerous benefits that agents in these games can harvest from playing with these boundaries (hightened common cause, humor, separation of concerns, etc.). So I&#8217;m amazed that Google has decided that one, just one, such case deserves a bit of special handling. This is the fundamental problem of a system like Google&#8217;s. All words are tags, all search terms have contextual meanings. I like that they have tried to do something. I hope they find a way to make it scale. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

