<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: small gods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2003/06/small-gods/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2003/06/small-gods</link>
	<description>Ben Hyde</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santiago Gala</title>
		<link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2003/06/small-gods/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Santiago Gala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2003/06/small-gods/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I agree that languages (and even frameworks) do shape communities much more than protocols.

But having open protocols enables us to build and integrate on top of and regardless of closed communities.

I don&#039;t get the point completely, unless the point is something like &quot;people will lock themselves into languages, and most of them will never learn to unlock themselves using protocols&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that languages (and even frameworks) do shape communities much more than protocols.</p>
<p>But having open protocols enables us to build and integrate on top of and regardless of closed communities.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get the point completely, unless the point is something like &#8220;people will lock themselves into languages, and most of them will never learn to unlock themselves using protocols&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

